✦

Contemporary Spiritualities

New Thought

« Central orientation: the power attributed to thought, affirmative prayer and a spiritual reading of health and prosperity. »
United States19th centuryContemporary Spiritualities

Introduction

Understanding New Thought

New Thought is presented in its setting of origin — United States, 19th century — without reducing it to a single formula. Its central orientation can be summarized as the power attributed to thought, affirmative prayer and a spiritual reading of health and prosperity.

New Thought includes schools, lineages, communities or interpretations that may differ. This entry separates historical evidence, insiders’ claims and research findings.

To be retained

Four essential principles

  • Central orientation: the power attributed to thought, affirmative prayer and a spiritual reading of health and prosperity.
  • Its documented history is rooted in United States, around 19th century.
  • Practices notably include Prayer.
  • Internal diversity and cultural context should be respected.

Small timeline

A tradition shaped by history

19th century

Origins and formation

The documented formation of New Thought is associated with United States, around 19th century. The founding figure or attribution used here is: Phineas Parkhurst Quimby and plusieurs organisateurs du XIXe century. Early dates remain approximate when sources are late or fragmentary.

Development

Historical developments

Major historical reference points include United States, XIXe century, Emma Curtis Hopkins, and Unity and Religious Science au XXe century. They mark stages of transmission rather than a uniform or complete history.

Transmission

Ritual life and transmission

Commonly reported forms of practice include Prayer, Affirmations and affirmative prayer, Study of texts and commentaries, Community life, and Self-examination. Their meaning, frequency and conditions of access vary by community.

Today

Contemporary diversity

New Thought includes schools, lineages, communities or interpretations that may differ. This entry separates historical evidence, insiders’ claims and research findings.

Documented knowledge

History and development

The documented formation of New Thought is associated with United States, around 19th century. The founding figure or attribution used here is: Phineas Parkhurst Quimby and plusieurs organisateurs du XIXe century. Early dates remain approximate when sources are late or fragmentary.

Major historical reference points include United States, XIXe century, Emma Curtis Hopkins, and Unity and Religious Science au XXe century. They mark stages of transmission rather than a uniform or complete history.

Traditions and philosophies

Worldview, beliefs and practices

Sources and practitioners commonly describe the heart of New Thought as the power attributed to thought, affirmative prayer and a spiritual reading of health and prosperity. This wording reports a shared orientation without deciding the metaphysical truth of its beliefs.

Commonly reported forms of practice include Prayer, Affirmations and affirmative prayer, Study of texts and commentaries, Community life, and Self-examination. Their meaning, frequency and conditions of access vary by community.

Documented knowledge

Texts, symbols and transmission

Major supports for transmission include écrits de P. P. Quimby, Scientific Christian Mental Practice, and Science of Mind. Commonly associated symbols include pensée, lumière, and logos institutionnels variables. Their interpretation depends on place, period and lineage.

Scientific lighting

Historical and scientific perspective

Evidence for health or well-being varies greatly with the method and study quality. These practices do not replace diagnosis, treatment or qualified psychological care.

Implementation

Cultural cautions

Avoid healing promises or intensive unsupervised practice, especially with respiratory, cardiovascular or mental-health conditions.

Scientific lighting

What research can and cannot say

Evidence for health or well-being varies greatly with the method and study quality. These practices do not replace diagnosis, treatment or qualified psychological care.

References

Sources for further development